Page 154 - 1991.Millard.North

Should scientific knowledge be
limited by a concern for societal
good?

"The purpose of science
is to further the good of
society through
increased knowledge. Varsity Policy Debate: front-Ben Koch ,Bri an Goodbrake, Natali e Edmonds, Sarah Schafer, Lori Lee, Gwynn Schoonmake1
Any actions that it takes second row-Mitch Dawes, Jerry Wilwerding, Scott O'Donnell, Julie Gniffke, John Cohn, Vanessa Dixon, Shane Bu scher, Poll
negatively conflicts with Faltin, Carrie McClusly, Chris Eastep, Lyndsie Tyler; back-Matt Willians, Eric Englert, Chris Reid , Jerry Christi anson, Jaso
Bealle, Keith Weiner, Brian Julian, Dave Nickel, Tom Farrell, Keeley Cain, Kyle Norman, John David (C. Hooper)
its original intent."
Junior Bryan Cranny

"If ignorance is bliss,
then you could acheive
a societal utopia. " -
Sophomore Trasi
Martin.

"/ think that it should
be because science is
here for society, and if
it isn't serving its
purpose, then it ought
to be limited." -Junior
Hope Dameier

During tournaments, dedicated debators often took time to
- ~
discuss the resolution even between rounds. Senior Jerry
Wilwerding and Junior Dave Nickel discuss evidence at a
Millard South tournament. (J. Burns)

Novice Policy Debate: front-Sam Pane, Erin Felcher, Stacy McMichael, Jessica Wilson; middle-Bill Nel son, Derec Wil
Elizabeth Vantilburg, Michelle Herrera, Katie Ecklund, Dulcie Holland; back-Casey Ballentine, Ryan Croft, Barry Davit
Brian Cranny, Gary Smith (C. Hooper)

Debate